The conventional approach to pension asset management and asset allocation in retirement assumes that one pool of invested pension assets should be regarded as a single portfolio (although possibly with multiple investment managers) having a single level of risk tolerance and acting as an offset to a single pool of pension liabilities. However, the estimated magnitude of the pension liabilities is something less than precise and establishing investment objectives to meet such an uncertain target is not easy. Some corporations have met this problem by making distinctions among the liabilities and offsetting each pool of liabilities with a separate portfolio with appropriate risk and return objectives. (more…)

Sense of financial security in retirement will elude anyone who worries about what will happen to them when someone else dies. Whether the risk is loss of investment expertise, the absolute loss of income (e.g., because a pension benefit has no survivor benefit), the loss of assets to probate and estate taxes, or other circumstance of financial loss, providing for survivors is an element of financial security in retirement. (more…)

Issues around retirement income planning are the most obvious. The traditional “three-legged stool” of retirement income planning—Social Security, pension income benefit, and income from personal savings and investments—is increasingly unsteady. Social Security faces a funding crisis in the first half of the twenty-first century because soon there may not be enough workers paying into the system to support those receiving its benefits. Social Security income lifts more than one in three older persons out of poverty—more than 60% of them women. It is by far the single most important contributor to financial security in old age in America. (more…)

In December 2002, the U.S. Treasury Department issued some long-awaited guidance to employers about cash balance plans. These proposed regulations, issued under Internal Revenue Code Section 411 (b)(1)(H), prohibit age discrimination employment in benefit accruals and are fairly comprehensive in nature. Although a public hearing on the regulations was held in April 2003, the rules are not yet final as this article goes to press.

In essence, the regulations generally indicate that a company cannot directly or indirectly affect a participant’s benefit accrual based on age. (more…)

For Early Retirement Incentive Plans within a defined pension plan, the most common incentive is the addition of age or service credits in calculating pension benefits. Typically, “5 and 5”—adding five years to age and/or five years to length of service—is offered. Other incentives may reduce or eliminate the penalty for early retirement, provide cash supplements until an employee is eligible for Social Security (in the main, at age 62, though some plans bridge payments to age 65), provision of life insurance, outplacement assistance, and less often, retiree health benefits (Hewitt Associates 1997). (more…)

A company may terminate an employee benefit plan. However, a plan qualified for favorable tax treatment under the Internal Revenue Code must provide that, in effect, each affected participant becomes fully vested in his accrued benefit at the time of termination. ERISA also provides that, for defined benefit plans, the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (PBGC) must be notified. (more…)

No one likes to think about getting a divorce, but unfortunately, half of those marrying today will end up divorced. (I’ve often wondered if that statistic took into account Zsa Zsa Gabor, Liza Minnelli, and Elizabeth Taylor, but that’s another story.) In a divorce, particularly with relationships that have lasted over 10 years, spouses may be entitled to Social Security benefits and pension benefits. (more…)

Because gay, lesbian, bisexual, and transgender people can still be legally discriminated against in employment in most of the country, and because gay couples are not treated equally under Social Security, pension income is an important policy issue affecting gay elders. Contrary to a widely held stereotype of gay affluence, gay men and lesbians earn no more than heterosexual men and women. In fact, gay men earn about 15% to 20% less than heterosexual men. Lesbians earn the same as heterosexual women, but because women on average earn less than men, lesbian couple households earn significantly less than heterosexual couple households (Klawitter and Flatt 1998). (more…)

Once the cash flows to be financed are determined, whether via a detailed version of the determination of planned expenditures or the simpler “rule of thumb approach,” the question of how each $1 of assets will be turned into an income flow must be addressed. How much income will each dollar generate, and for how long? This is the basic issue of longevity risk (the risk that a person will live either beyond, or not until, their “life expectancy”). This source of uncertainty presents perhaps the most significant challenge for cash flow planning in retirement. (more…)

Most workers assume they will decide when to retire. Sometimes, however, an employer suggests it in the form of an early retirement (a.k.a. “buyout”) offer. An early retirement incentive plans offer may or may not be voluntary. If it seems likely that employees will lose their jobs anyway with less generous terms (e.g., a specific department is being targeted), taking a buyout is typically advised (Wollan 2002). (more…)